case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred before its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It really is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or Lady usually do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they might cut off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is recognized and also the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct is not really satisfactory although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful way. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually pretty obscure about whether the 90-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the 90-working day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Because of this, simply citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-these kinds of neighborhood, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than here it’s value.
The justices must be balanced between the political parties, this sort of that neither party has an advantage of more than one seat. To qualify to provide over the Supreme Court, a candidate must have been admitted to practice law in New Jersey for a minimum of ten years. This could be the same prerequisite as for Superior Court judges.
12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons obtaining their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation on the police, plus they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect and not abduct. Read more
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Even though the pair experienced two younger children of their have at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report for the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement within the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced youthful children.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion can be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for turning out to be entitled to become thought of for promotion to your higher grade, of course, just isn't without logic as the officer that's to begin with inducted into a particular post needs to serve on the explained post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to serve the public inside of a befitting way.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.